Don’t Buy These Bikes if You Want to Keep Them Forever
Buying a bike is not just about owning a vehicle; it is about building a long-term relationship with it. Many people buy a bike thinking they will ride it every day for years, treat it like a family member, and never want to sell it. But not all bikes are suitable for this kind of long-term ownership. Some bikes, while attractive initially, develop serious engine problems after a few years. Frequent repairs, low reliability, and high maintenance costs make them unsuitable for long-term use.
If your intention is to keep a bike for a long time, especially more than five years, there are certain bikes you should avoid. You can still buy these bikes if your plan is short-term ownership—like five years or less—then sell them later. But for anyone who wants a bike that will remain reliable and trouble-free for many years, these options are not recommended.
1. Bajaj Pulsar 150 / 180
The Bajaj Pulsar series is one of the most popular bikes in India. Many beginners start with the Pulsar because it offers decent power, sporty design, and is easy to handle. Initially, the engine feels smooth, the bike has good acceleration, and it is fun to ride. But the reality for long-term owners is very different.
After around five years, the Pulsar engine starts showing serious problems. Riders often report that the engine develops a rough sound, almost like a tractor, and requires repairs frequently. Daily riding accelerates this wear and tear, and many owners find themselves taking the bike to the service center every two months.
Mileage, which was initially decent, starts decreasing significantly. Engine performance drops, and even though the bike looks and feels sporty, the power is no longer consistent. Rebuilding the engine, also known as rebore, becomes necessary to restore performance, which is an expensive process.
For someone planning to keep the bike long-term, the Pulsar 150/180 becomes a stressful ownership experience. The maintenance cost increases over time, and the reliability decreases sharply. While this bike is fine for short-term use, for long-term commitment, it is better to avoid it entirely.
2. Hero Super Splendor Xtec
The Hero Super Splendor Xtec is another popular commuter bike. It is known for its fuel efficiency, comfortable seating, and low running cost. On paper, it seems like a reliable choice for daily commuting. However, the reality for long-term ownership is disappointing.
The engine in the Super Splendor Xtec lacks power and refinement. Over time, the performance becomes sluggish, and the engine feels worn out. Even though it is a great bike for commuting in the first few years, long-term users notice that the engine starts losing efficiency and smoothness. The power is insufficient for riders who expect a bit of punch in city traffic or on highways.
Because of this, the Super Splendor Xtec is not recommended for riders who plan to keep a bike for more than five years. The engine will not maintain its performance, and frequent minor issues can become frustrating. For short-term use, it is acceptable, but it fails to deliver reliability and satisfaction over a long period.
3. Royal Enfield Bullet 350
The Royal Enfield Bullet 350 is one of the most iconic bikes in India. Many riders are drawn to it for its classic design, deep exhaust note, and vintage appeal. The Bullet 350 has a loyal fan base, and its retro styling is unmatched. But when it comes to long-term ownership, the modern version of the Bullet 350 has limitations.
Over time, the engine no longer performs as smoothly as it did when new. Frequent engine problems become common, and the power output drops considerably after several years of use. The mileage also declines, making it less efficient for daily commuting. While the bike still looks stylish and gives a vintage feel, its performance for long-term use is not ideal.
The Bullet 350 is particularly unsuitable for riders who expect high reliability and low maintenance costs. After ten years of use, the power of the bike may reduce to almost half of what it originally delivered. Repairs, tuning, and maintenance become an ongoing commitment, making it more of a hobby bike than a practical long-term vehicle.
Personal Experience and Advice
From personal experience and observing long-term riders, I have found that the Pulsar 150/180 starts showing engine problems after five years. The Super Splendor Xtec engine becomes underpowered and lacks refinement. The Bullet 350, although classic in design, loses power and efficiency over time.
It is important to make an informed decision when buying a bike. Think about your riding habits, the number of years you intend to keep the bike, and your expectations for performance and maintenance. If you are planning to ride daily and maintain the bike like a family member, it is crucial to avoid bikes that are known for long-term issues.
Owning a bike is a long-term commitment, and choosing the right bike can save you from unnecessary stress and expenses. The Bajaj Pulsar 150/180, Hero Super Splendor Xtec, and Royal Enfield Bullet 350 are excellent bikes for beginners, short-term riders, or those who enjoy style and affordability. But for riders who want a bike they can keep for a decade or more, these models may not be the best choice.
Focus on bikes that offer consistent performance, low maintenance, and smooth engines. Make sure your investment is worthwhile, and you enjoy a stress-free riding experience for years to come. Always check reviews, personal experiences, and long-term reliability reports before making a purchase.
By being aware of these factors, you can avoid unnecessary engine problems, repeated repairs, and declining performance. For short-term ownership, the three bikes mentioned are fine. But for long-term enjoyment and peace of mind, it is better to look for alternatives that provide both power and reliability.
About the Author
